We examine the relationship, across 39 countries, between regulation and entrepreneurship using a new two-equation model. We find the minimum capital requirement required to start a business lowers entrepreneurship rates across countries, as do labour market regulations. However the administrative considerations of starting a business – such as the time, the cost, or the number of procedures required – are unrelated to the formation rate of either nascent or young businesses. Given the explicit link made by Djankov et al. [Djankov et al. 2002, ‹The Regulation of Entry’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 1–37] between the speed and ease with which businesses may be established in a country and its economic performance – and the enthusiasm with which this link has been grasped by European Union policy makers – our findings imply this link needs reconsidering.

FULL TEXT

References

1. Acs, Z. J., P. Arenius, M. Hay and M. Minniti, 2005, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2004 Executive Report, Wellesley, MA: Babson College

2. Armour, J. and D. J. Cumming, 2005, ‚Bankruptcy Law and Entrepreneurship’, American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings, Paper 26

3. Audretsch D. B., Grilo I., Thurik A. R. 2007, ‚Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: a Framework’. In: Audretsch D. B., Grilo I., Thurik A. R. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK, forthcoming

   Google Scholar 

4. Baumol W. J., 1990, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98(5), 893–921

   Article Google Scholar 

5. Blanchflower D. G., Oswald A., Stutzer A.. 2001, Latent Entrepreneurship Across Nations. European Economic Review 45(4–6), 680–691

   Article Google Scholar 

6. Botero J., Djankov S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A.. 2004, The Regulation of Labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 1339–1382

   Article Google Scholar 

7. Capelleras, J., K. Mole, F. J. Greene and D. J. Storey, 2005, ‚Do More Heavily Regulated Economies have Poorer Performing New Ventures? Evidence from Britain and Spain’, CSME Working Paper Series no. 86, Coventry: University of Warwick

8. Dennis, W. J., Jr., 2004, ‚Creating and Sustaining a Viable Small Business Sector’, Paper presented at School of Continuing Education, University of Oklahoma, 27th October

9. Djankov S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. 2002, The Regulation of Entry Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 1–37

   Article Google Scholar 

10. Grilo I., Irigoyen J., 2006, Entrepreneurship in the EU: To Wish and Not to Be. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 305–318

    Article Google Scholar 

11. Grilo I., Thurik A. R., 2005, Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1(4), 441–459

    Article Google Scholar 

12. Grilo, I. and A. R. Thurik, 2006, ‚Entrepreneurship in the Old and New Europe’, in Santarelli, E. (ed.), Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Innovation: The Dynamics of Firms and Industries: International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 12, Berlin: Springer Science, pp. 75–103

13. Lundström A., Stevenson L. 2002, Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future. Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

14. Lundström A., Stevenson L. 2005, Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

15. Reynolds P. D., Hay M., Camp S. 1999, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 1999 Executive Report. Babson College, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

16. Reynolds P. D., Bygrave W. D., Autio E., Cox L. W., Hay M. 2002, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2002 Executive Report. Babson College, Wellesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

17. Reynolds P. D., Bosma N., Autio E., Hunt S., de Bono N., Servais I., Lopez-Garcia P., Chin N. 2005, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics 24(3), 205–231

    Article Google Scholar 

18. Stel A.J. van, Storey D.J. 2004, ‚The Link between Firm Births and Job Creation: Is there a Upas Tree Effect?’. Regional Studies 38(8), 893–909

    Article Google Scholar 

19. Stel A. J. van, Carree M. A., Thurik A.R. 2005, The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth. Small Business Economics 24(3), 311–321

    Article Google Scholar 

20. van Stel, A. J., D. J. Storey and A. R. Thurik, 2006, ‚The Effect of Business Regulations on Nascent and Actual Entrepreneurship’, Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 04-2006. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena

21. Sternberg R., Wennekers S. 2005, Determinants and Effects of New Business Creation Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data. Small Business Economics 24(3), 193–203

    Article Google Scholar 

22. Storey, D. J., 2003, ‚Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and Public Policies’. in Z. J. Acs and D.␣B.␣Audretsch (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA/NL pp. 473–514

23. Verheul, I., S. Wennekers, D. Audretsch and R. Thurik, 2002, ‚An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions and Culture’. in D. B. Audretsch, A. R. Thurik, I.␣Verheul and A. R. M. Wennekers (eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and Policy in a European-US Comparison, Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 11–81

24. Verheul I., van Stel A. J., Thurik A. R. 2006, Explaining Female and Male Entrepreneurship at the Country Level. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18(2), 151–183

    Article Google Scholar 

25. Wennekers S., van Stel A., Thurik R., Reynolds P. 2005, Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development. Small Business Economics 24(3), 293–309

    Article Google Scholar 

26. World Bank, 2005, Doing Business in 2005; Removing Obstacles to Growth, Washington, DC: World Bank